Describe another alternative to the changes process on small projects (like that involved in Watson). Why is this an improvement? What are the downsides?

In Watson Lumber Company v Gunneweig, the court ruled that a small project that had previously been finished needed to be modified. This demonstrated the necessity of a precise and organized method for dealing with modifications on small projects. Incorporating a change order clause into the contract is an alternative strategy for solving this issue.

Both parties participating in a small project can profit from a change order clause in several ways. One of the main advantages is that it offers a straightforward and organized procedure for dealing with changes. Ensuring that the modifications are properly documented, evaluated, and authorized can help avoid disagreements and delays. This can also guarantee that modifications be implemented promptly, which is crucial for small projects because changes may be more likely to occur in these situations. The ability to react more quickly to unanticipated problems or shifting requirements is another advantage of incorporating a change order clause. Small projects, where the scope and needs might not be well specified at the beginning might benefit the most from this. Both parties may modify as needed without worrying about delays or disagreements by establishing a clear method for addressing changes.

The inclusion of a change order clause does have certain drawbacks though. It can result in more paperwork and administrative work, which could be a problem while managing a project. On small projects with few resources, this can be extremely difficult. Furthermore, if modifications are not properly documented, examined, and authorized, it may result in extra expenses or delays. If the parties cannot come to an understanding over the nature or cost of the adjustments, then change order clauses may be the cause of disagreements. To resolve conflicts, legal action may occasionally still be required. To guarantee that any change order clause is correctly crafted and fulfills the demands of the project, it is crucial to engage with legal counsel. Doing so can be expensive and time-consuming. Change order clauses are often used in construction contracts in the US and are usually regarded as best practices. However, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the project the precise wording and requirements of these sections may change. To make sure that any change order clause is correctly written and satisfied the demands of the project.


Another approach to resolving this problem is to include a change order provision in the contract. A change order clause might be advantageous to both parties in a small project in several ways. One of its key benefits is that it provides a simple and structured process for handling modifications. It is possible to prevent disputes and delays by making sure that the alterations are properly documented, assessed, and authorized. Additionally, this helps ensure that adjustments are made as soon as possible, which is important for small projects because changes may be more likely to occur in these circumstances.